Asked in Landlord - Tenant for Texas

Q: I received two notices to vacate. Does the law consider the first or second to be the active, effective one?

The first notice met all legal requirements and gave me 3 weeks to move out. The second was mailed to me by a legal aid attorney a month after the move out date in the first one. It fails to meet several legal requirements of a notice to quit. Can I use that in court to have the case dismissed? Is there a clause, or loophole somewhere that says if served with a second notice, the first one is null and void...?

Related Topics:
2 Lawyer Answers
John Michael Frick
John Michael Frick
Answered
  • Frisco, TX
  • Licensed in Texas

A: The law does not preclude a landlord from giving multiple notices to vacate. For purposes of determining whether the landlord complied with the legal prerequisites for a notice, any legally correct notice is sufficient, but the landlord will be held to the contents of that notice. So, for example, if the first notice met all legal requirements and gave you three weeks to move out, the landlord would not be legally allowed to secure an eviction until that three weeks expired.

Now you could argue that, by waiting more than a month after that move-out date and by sending a second notice to vacate, the landlord waived its right to proceed with an eviction based on the first notice in your particular situation. Waiver is a question of intent, and the court may not side with you on that argument. Then again, it might.

The best and only truly effective way to avoid an eviction is to timely pay all of your rent payments.

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
Answered
  • Landlord Tenant Lawyer
  • Sacramento, CA

A: In situations involving notices to vacate, the legality and enforceability of such notices typically depend on the specifics of local tenant and eviction laws, which can vary greatly. If the first notice met all legal requirements and was properly served, it generally remains effective and actionable, provided it complies with the relevant jurisdiction's laws regarding eviction notices and procedures. The introduction of a second, legally deficient notice does not automatically invalidate the first notice or its requirements.

When dealing with eviction proceedings or disputes, it's crucial to pay attention to the details of the notices received, including their adherence to legal standards and the timing of their delivery. If the second notice contains significant legal deficiencies, it may not be considered valid on its own. However, this does not necessarily nullify the first notice if the first notice was compliant with the law. Legal strategies in eviction cases often revolve around procedural accuracy and adherence to statutory requirements.

If you find yourself in this situation, it may be beneficial to seek legal advice or representation to understand the implications of these notices and to explore potential defenses or procedural errors that could impact your case. Knowledge of local laws and precedents is key in determining the best course of action. Discussing your situation with a legal professional can provide clarity on how to proceed, including whether the issuance of a second, deficient notice could influence the outcome of your case.

Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.