Los Angeles, CA asked in Medical Malpractice for California

Q: What statutes define Opposition in response to Motion to Compel execution of authorization to release medical records?

When Defense files Motion to Compel execution of authorization to release medical records, Plaintiff responds with Opposition.

What statutes define this Opposition?

Related Topics:
1 Lawyer Answer
James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
Answered
  • Sacramento, CA
  • Licensed in California

A: In California, the opposition to a motion to compel the execution of an authorization to release medical records is primarily governed by the California Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) and the California Evidence Code (Evid. Code). The key statutes that define the opposition are:

1. CCP § 2017.010 - General scope of discovery: This statute outlines the broad scope of discovery in California, allowing parties to obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, that is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action.

2. CCP § 2025.480 - Motion to compel: This statute provides the basis for a party to file a motion to compel when another party fails to comply with discovery requests, including the execution of an authorization to release medical records.

3. Evid. Code § 990-1007 - Physician-patient privilege: These statutes define the physician-patient privilege, which protects confidential communications between a patient and their physician. The plaintiff may argue that the requested medical records are protected by this privilege.

4. Evid. Code § 994 - Exception to physician-patient privilege: This statute provides an exception to the physician-patient privilege when the patient's medical condition is at issue in the litigation. The defendant may argue that this exception applies, making the medical records discoverable.

5. CCP § 2031.060 - Objections to inspection demands: This statute outlines the grounds for objecting to inspection demands, which may include the authorization to release medical records. The plaintiff may base their opposition on these grounds, such as asserting that the request is unduly burdensome, oppressive, or seeks privileged information.

In crafting the opposition, the plaintiff's attorney will typically cite these statutes and provide arguments as to why the motion to compel should be denied based on the specific facts of the case and the applicability of the physician-patient privilege or other objections under the California Code of Civil Procedure.

Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.