You can do both. As far as your rules and case law that is what an attorney is PAID to do.

The civil judge has no jurisdiction over the criminal court. Your attorney should have objected to the admission of that evidence before it was ever presented to a jury.

It would depend on the type of Evading, on foot or in a vehicle, and his criminal record. But generally probation.

Because the Court controls the trial settings not the defense attorney. The defense attorney cannot make the State go to trial as long as other trials are being held.

Yes, but unless you actually saw the assault you will need her cooperation to file charges.

Generally if the minors are within 3 years in age their is an affirmative defense to the offense. For children 13 and under the juvenile laws are somewhat different.

Not if it is a lesser included offense of the murder case. However, you can be charged in a State Court be found not guilty and later tried in a Federal Court because these are two different jurisdictions.

Your question does not give enough detail to answer properly. Did you ask her to leave initially? Did she enter your property without permission? All these things make a difference.

Yes, your location is not protected information.

It would depend if you are still occupying the room under the rental agreement. If you stay past your date of payment then they do not need warrant. If you are still within your paid stay time then they would need a warrant. There are some other exceptions such as exigent circumstances or plain... View More

This would be a second degree felony and the punishment range would be 2-20 years in the penitentiary and up to a $10,000 fine. If your son is younger than 14 it could be a first degree felony.

Your fact situation is impossible the way it is written. Your son could not have been sentenced to 20 years in prison without an attorney unless your son wanted to represent himself.

Statute of Limitations is 3 years, I would argue it is 2 but let's just say 3. If you are eligible to have a weapon then yes you should get it back once your cases is dismissed.

Yes it is legal because you violated the conditions of your original bond. First of all unless you have prior offenses the original and new bond are excessive.

It depends on what the threat was. It also will depend on if it was a conditional threat or if she had the right to some interest that you are infringing upon.

Your question is unclear. You don't say much much time that you have left so it is impossible to tell you how much more it will cost.

Parole or probation? If probation you must have the interlock on at least 50% of the probationary period. It can be for the whole time. For parole it depends on the conditions of your parole. If you are on parole for a DWI related offense the chances are it will be for the full length of... View More

For what? Court costs, yes.

If the motion has already been determined only the Court can make the decision on how his sentence is served. If the motion is pending then the person is entitled to a bond pending the outcome.

You needed to hire an attorney as soon as the allegations were made. The police determine if charges are filed but they will generally error on the side of filing charges.