Cupertino, CA asked in Immigration Law for California

Q: Hello, My husband will be O visa soon. We are planning to apply for green card on our own. Would it be easy for us?

My husband is working for Apple in California. Apple is sponsoring for his O visa application but we would like to get green card asap. He completed his PhD at UC Berkeley and he published many papers and he was a great scholar. So, do you think that we will get green card easily after his O visa.

Related Topics:
2 Lawyer Answers
Edit Stelczner
PREMIUM
Edit Stelczner
Answered
  • Immigration Law Lawyer
  • New York, NY

A: If he is approved for an O visa that is a very good start as he proved to be at a certain standard of ability in the field. Yes, generally you will be able to apply for a green card however an extensive review of his accomplishments would be necessary to give a more appropriate evaluation. Congrats on the O visa!

Carl Shusterman agrees with this answer

Carl Shusterman
Carl Shusterman
Answered
  • Immigration Law Lawyer
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Licensed in California

A: Usually, it is more difficult to get a green card based on extraordinary ability than it is to get an O-1 visa.

Although meeting three of the following ten criteria will not guarantee that a person qualifies as an individual of extraordinary ability in the arts, sciences, education, business or athletics, if you can not satisfy at least three of the following items, you may wish to consider immigrating through another preference category:

Documentation of the alien’s receipt of lesser nationally or internationally- recognized prizes or awards for excellence in the field of endeavor;

Documentation of the alien’s membership in associations in the field for which classification is sought, which require outstanding achievements of their members, as judged by recognized national or international experts in their disciplines or fields;

Published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media, relating to the alien’s work in the field for which classification is sought. Such evidence shall include the title, date, and author of the material, and any necessary translation;

Evidence of the alien’s participation, either individually or on a panel, as a judge of the work of others in the same or an allied field of specification for which classification is sought;

Evidence of the alien’s original scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic, or business- related contributions of major significance in the field;

Evidence of the alien’s authorship of scholarly articles in the field, in professional or major trade publications or other major media;

Evidence of the display of the alien’s work in the field at artistic exhibitions or showcases;

Evidence that the alien has performed in a leading or critical role for organizations or establishments that have a distinguished reputation;

Evidence that the alien has commanded a high salary or other significantly high remuneration for services, in relation to others in the field; or

Evidence of commercial successes in the performing arts, as shown by box office receipts or record, cassette, compact disk, or video sales.

The USCIS changed its approach to deciding petitions for persons of extraordinary ability after the Federal Court decision in Kazarian v. USCIS, 596 F.3d 1115 (9 Cir. 2010).

USCIS now follows Kazarian’s two-step test: (1) Determine whether the petitioner has submitted evidence that meets the standards stated above; and (2) Determine whether the evidence submitted is sufficient to demonstrate that the beneficiary or self-petitioner meets the required high level of expertise for the extraordinary ability preference category during a final merits determination.

In other words, USCIS first analyzes whether the person’s evidence meets at least three of the above ten factors listed in the regulations. Only then does the agency consider whether he is a person of extraordinary ability.

Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.