Q: If a judge's ruling is ambiguous because of sarcasm, how should the defense go about challenging the ruling?
The judge denied a motion to "suppress all evidence relating to a confession made before being Mirandized" but is on record granting the motion for the defense. It seems the judge was being sarcastic when granting it and actually intended to deny it. The defendant was later found guilty. Can the defense challenge the denial on the grounds that the transcript shows the judge granting the motion? Or is the judge's intent what matters?
A: You're going to have to provide more information. Also, if the Defendant is entitled to an appeal of the Court's ruling you may be on a tight time schedule.
A: The judge's sarcasm is irrelevant. You are in the same position as any defendant who objected to admission of evidence at trial, but the judge overruled the objection and allowed it anyway: file a motion for new trial within 10 days, or appeal within 30 days, and argue the judge's ruling was wrong under the law and that error impacted the verdict. If the case law supports the suppression of the confession or incriminating statements, and the error was not "harmless," then your verdict will be reversed. A judge has authority in every case, prior to final judgment, to revisit any prior ruling made in the case, and change the ruling. So, even if the judge had granted the motion to suppress earlier in the case, but then during trial the prosecutor tried again to put the suppressed statements into evidence, the judge was free to allow it by reconsidering the prior grant of the motion and determining the statements should be allowed into evidence.
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.