Q: Property seller violates multiple laws, purchaser has hard evidence, judge ignores. What happened?
55.1-1204 Section C says Mr Sternberg is incorrect in his answer. He also says perjury and discrimination against protected classes is "irrelevant". I need someone who cares about those things and the law to answer.
Some points (this box isn't enough for all details):
- All owner finance payments were current
- Seller on Bill of Particulars wrote children and a pregnancy as a reason for eviction. Children were not damaging, not a 55+ community, and the house had enough rooms.
- Seller testified (lie/perjury) under oath they never agreed to sell, only rent. Admitted they refused any written agreement. Admitted the children and pregnancy were a reason with no context as to why.
- Buyer has evidence of fixing SELLER'S prior damages (since Seller wanted to claim Landlord in court)
- Buyer has receipts, text, audio, photo, and video evidence to ALL the above.
- Judge refused all evidence right from the start and ruled in favor of Seller.
I don't understand.
A: Most of the facts in your question are irrelevant. A contract for land must be in writing or it is void. Depending on where you are, a writing can sometimes be lots of things short of a Purchase and Sale Agreement on the local Board of Realtors form. I think there is one DC case in which a check signed by the party against whom it was being enforced. You need to review your facts with a lawyer licensed where the property is located. Contracts for lease must also be in writing, but contracts to repair places by laypeople need not be written. You might be able to get your expenses and damages. You may have already harmed your case, because your overly detailed description seems to admit that there was no contract, and that can be used against you. Get a lawyer to review the facts in a consult. And, if the property is worth less than the consult, skip it and move on.
Anthony M. Avery agrees with this answer
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.