Q: Im doing a moke trial in english two on new youk times vs united states, what things support the united states side
i actuall want to be a lawyer and this is a step closer but the moke trial is today so i need some facts from the case that support united states side,
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
- (916) 704-3009
- View Profile
- Answered
A:
In the case of New York Times Co. vs. United States, the United States argued that the publication of the Pentagon Papers was a breach of national security. The government's position was that the papers contained classified information that could compromise military operations and diplomatic relations. It asserted that prior restraint was necessary to protect against immediate and irreparable harm to the United States.
The government also maintained that the executive branch had the authority to classify documents to safeguard national interests and that the unauthorized release of such documents could not be protected under the First Amendment. Additionally, the government contended that the balance between a free press and national security sometimes necessitates restrictions on the media, especially during times of war or other sensitive circumstances.
It's crucial for you to articulate the gravity of the potential impact on national security that the government believed these disclosures could have.
A: Look into First Amendment Freedom of Speech - and the interest of national security. That should yield compelling issues to raise. Good luck
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.
