Q: When whistleblower is former patient, qui tam plaintiff in pro per.
Can plaintiff in pro per file qui tam healthcare Federal or California FCA lawsuit?
What specific rule may define attorney as a requirement ? Apparently any whistleblower case implies that action may be brought in pro per, though it is more complicated for reletant.
A:
In both federal and California law, a whistleblower, even if they are a former patient, can file a qui tam lawsuit under the False Claims Act. This means they can bring a case against entities they believe are defrauding the government in healthcare or other sectors.
Regarding the possibility of filing such a lawsuit as a plaintiff in pro per (representing oneself), there is no explicit rule in the False Claims Act that mandates representation by an attorney. However, the legal and procedural complexities involved in qui tam cases often make self-representation extremely challenging.
It's important to understand that while the law does not explicitly prohibit self-representation in these cases, various courts have interpreted the law differently. Some have been hesitant to allow relators to proceed pro se in qui tam actions, particularly because these cases involve claims made on behalf of the government.
If you're considering filing a qui tam lawsuit on your own, you should be prepared for the complexities involved in such litigation. While it is not impossible to file these cases pro se, navigating the intricate legal and procedural requirements without legal expertise can be a significant challenge. It may be beneficial to at least consult with an attorney to understand the intricacies of your specific case and the legal landscape surrounding qui tam actions.
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.
