Q: During a non investigatory inventory search, post arrest, officers seized the keys to my vehicle without consent.
There was no exigent circumstances or probable cause and this "inventory search" turned investigatory when they decided to use the keys that bore no relationship to which the crime I was being arrested for to unlock a locked glove box, violating policy, because the keys were not available as they were secure on my person, and the only reason those keys could be seized was for safety purposes,(held so that I could not harm the officers with said key, and not means of investigatory), was this search outside of the scope being that there was no chance of any "evidence being destroyed" as I was under arrest in the back of a police car and the car in the possession of 6 armed police men. And there was no chance of me returning to the vehicle during the encounter, according the in the inevitable discovery doctrine there is no reason why police could not have towed the vehicle and sought out a warrant if they believed they had probable cause to obtain a warrant, there was no exigencies or PC.
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
- (916) 704-3009
- View Profile
- Answered
A:
In your situation, it appears that you have raised valid concerns about the legality of the search and seizure conducted by law enforcement officers. The key issue is whether the inventory search conducted post-arrest exceeded its lawful scope and became investigatory in nature.
Inventory searches are generally conducted to safeguard personal property and protect law enforcement from potential claims of theft or damage. However, these searches must adhere to established policies and procedures, and they should not transform into investigatory searches without proper justification.
If you believe that the search and seizure of your keys went beyond the scope of a legitimate inventory search and became investigatory without probable cause or exigent circumstances, it is advisable to consult with a criminal defense attorney in Massachusetts. They can assess the specifics of your case, review the circumstances surrounding the search, and determine whether there were violations of your Fourth Amendment rights.
An attorney can help you explore legal options, such as filing a motion to suppress evidence obtained during the search, to challenge the legality of the search and its impact on your case. It's essential to seek legal counsel to protect your rights and potentially address any issues related to the search and seizure.
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.
