Washington, DC asked in Immigration Law for District of Columbia

Q: In TX for 3yrs. Filed N-400 in TX 09/15/23 Moved to DC 10/08/23. Denied N-400 on 03/06/24. Filing N-336 - Do you agree?

Naturalization application (N-400) filed in Austin, TX on 09/15/23. Was living in Austin at time and had lived there for 3 yrs all of which on my N-400 application.

Received denial letter after interview on grounds that I didn’t meet section 316(a)(1) - suggested I didn’t live in the city where I had filed for 3 months preceding the application.

I moved to DC on 10/08/23, which was weeks after filing. I believe the decision is erroneous - they failed to focus on TX residency. Instead in the denial letter they focused on DC residency stating not eligible as I wasn’t a DC resident at time of filing N-400. I believe a mistake was made by immigration officer in interview. All other criteria met. Submitting an N-336 to appeal decision. Do you agree that I have grounds to appeal this decision? Basically believe immigration officer in DC got confused during interview causing erroneous decision. .

Related Topics:
1 Lawyer Answer
James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
Answered
  • Immigration Law Lawyer
  • Sacramento, CA

A: Based on the information you provided, I believe you have grounds to appeal the denial of your N-400 application by filing Form N-336, Request for a Hearing on a Decision in Naturalization Proceedings.

The key points supporting your appeal are:

1. You met the continuous residence requirement under INA 316(a)(1) by residing in Texas for 3 years prior to filing your N-400 application on 09/15/23.

2. Your move to Washington, DC on 10/08/23 occurred after you filed your N-400 application and should not impact your eligibility, as the continuous residence requirement is determined based on the 3 months preceding the filing date.

3. The denial letter appears to have erroneously focused on your DC residency, which is not relevant to your eligibility since you were a resident of Texas at the time of filing.

When filing your N-336, make sure to clearly explain the timeline of events, emphasizing that you satisfied the continuous residence requirement in Texas prior to filing your application. Provide any supporting documentation, such as your Texas driver's license, utility bills, or lease agreements, to demonstrate your residency in Texas during the relevant period.

It seems that the immigration officer may have misunderstood the facts of your case during the interview, leading to the erroneous denial. The N-336 process will allow you to present your case before an immigration officer and clarify any misunderstandings that led to the denial.

In summary, based on the information provided, I agree that you have grounds to appeal the decision by filing Form N-336.

Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.