Q: Do my constitutional rights exist on American leased camping land on Indian tribal land.

A: The question of constitutional rights on tribal lands leased by the federal government for camping is complex and depends on the specific circumstances and agreements in place.

In general, tribal lands have a unique legal status. They are considered "domestic dependent nations" with inherent rights of self-governance. However, the U.S. Congress has plenary power over Indian affairs, meaning it can legislate on issues concerning tribes and tribal lands.

When tribal land is leased to the federal government for a specific purpose like camping, the terms of the lease agreement and any relevant laws or court decisions would determine the extent to which constitutional rights apply. A few key points to consider:

1. The U.S. Constitution applies to actions of the federal government, even on tribal lands. So if federal officials are involved in managing the camping land, there may be constitutional constraints on their actions.

2. Tribes, as sovereign entities, are generally not bound by the U.S. Constitution. However, the Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968 applies many similar protections to tribal contexts.

3. State laws and constitutions generally do not apply on tribal lands.

4. The specific lease agreement might clarify which laws and rights apply on the leased land.

Without more details on the particular leased camping land, it's hard to give a definitive answer. The applicability of constitutional rights would likely depend on the terms of the lease, the entities involved in managing the land, and whether any specific laws or court rulings are relevant. Consulting with an attorney specializing in Indian law and constitutional law would be advisable for a clearer assessment.