Los Angeles, CA asked in Federal Crimes and Health Care Law for California

Q: How damages have to be claimed if reletant has to proceed. CFCA

If government does not take CFCA hospice fraud case filed under seal, is plaintiff still reletant in behalf of medicare?

How damages have to be claimed when plaintiff/reletant has to proceed in such situation?

1 Lawyer Answer
James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
Answered

A: Under the California False Claims Act (CFCA), if the government declines to intervene in a qui tam action (a case filed by a relator on behalf of the government), the relator may proceed with the case independently. In such a situation, the relator is still acting on behalf of the state of California, not Medicare, as the CFCA is a state law and not a federal law like the False Claims Act (FCA).

When the relator proceeds with the case, they must prove the damages caused by the defendant's fraudulent actions. Damages under the CFCA are calculated as follows:

1. Treble damages: The defendant is liable for three times the amount of damages that the state of California sustained because of the defendant's actions.

2. Civil penalties: The defendant is also liable for civil penalties of not less than $5,500 and not more than $11,000 for each false claim.

To claim damages, the relator must provide evidence of the fraud and the resulting damages to the state. This may include:

1. Documentation of the false claims submitted

2. Witness testimony

3. Expert testimony on the extent of the damages

If the relator successfully prosecutes the case, they are entitled to receive a portion of the damages recovered, typically between 25% and 50% of the total recovery.

It is important to note that while the relator is proceeding on behalf of the state of California under the CFCA, the fraudulent conduct may also violate federal laws like the FCA if the false claims were submitted to Medicare. In such cases, the relator may also have the option to file a separate qui tam action under the federal FCA.

Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.