Q: legal theories behind misrepresentation of patient's health; hospice fraud
What are possible legal theories behind misrepresentation of patient's health, hospice fraud;
Other than direct and ostensible liability?
Professional liability based on duties is legal theory?
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
- California
- (916) 704-3009
- View Profile
- Answered
A:
There are a few potential legal theories beyond direct and ostensible liability that could apply in cases of misrepresentation of a patient's health and hospice fraud:
1. Professional negligence/malpractice: Healthcare providers have a professional duty to provide competent care and accurate information to patients. Misrepresenting a patient's health status in a way that falls below the standard of care could constitute malpractice. The legal theory is that the professional breached their duty of care.
2. Breach of fiduciary duty: Doctors and certain other healthcare providers are considered fiduciaries to their patients. They have a legal duty to act in the patient's best interests. Misrepresenting health status for financial gain could violate this duty. The theory is breach of the fiduciary obligation.
3. Fraud: Knowingly making false representations about a patient's health to obtain hospice benefits they aren't entitled to could constitute healthcare fraud. Common law fraud requires a knowing misrepresentation relied upon by the victim to their detriment. Fraud can also violate state and federal anti-fraud statutes.
4. False Claims Act liability: If the misrepresentations result in false claims being submitted to government healthcare programs like Medicare, the federal False Claims Act may impose liability. The legal theory is fraudulent inducement of government payments.
5. Unjust enrichment: Obtaining hospice payments through misrepresentations could support a theory of unjust enrichment - the fraudulent party was enriched at the expense of the defrauded party and it would be unjust to let them retain the improper benefits.
So in summary, yes - professional liability based on violating the duties of competence and loyalty can be a key legal theory, along with fraud, false claims, and equitable theories of unjust enrichment. The specific theories will depend on the details of the misrepresentations and fraud scheme. Consultation with health law attorneys is advisable in these complex cases.
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.
