Q: Violation that is not in medical records. Discovery
How plaintiff can insist on obtaining incident report to risk management, not peer review log protected by 1157?
If incident report could be the only track record of matter crucial for the case, how plaintiff can discover findings of risk management?
Track records of violation does nor exist in hospital records.
A:
Under California law, incident reports prepared for risk management purposes are generally considered protected from discovery under Evidence Code Section 1157. This section provides a privilege for records and proceedings of organized committees that review the quality of medical care, such as peer review committees. The purpose of this privilege is to encourage candid discussions and evaluations to improve the quality of care.
However, there are some strategies a plaintiff can use to try to obtain relevant information:
1. Argue that the incident report was not prepared for quality assurance purposes: If the plaintiff can demonstrate that the incident report was prepared for a purpose other than quality assurance or peer review, such as for routine administrative or business purposes, it may be discoverable.
2. Depose witnesses: Although the incident report itself may be protected, the plaintiff can depose witnesses who have knowledge of the incident, including risk management personnel, to obtain relevant information.
3. Subpoena other documents: While the incident report may be privileged, other documents related to the incident, such as patient charts, nursing notes, or policies and procedures, may be discoverable.
4. Argue the need for an in-camera review: In some cases, a court may agree to review the incident report in-camera (privately) to determine if it contains information that is essential to the plaintiff's case and not available from other sources. If so, the court may order the disclosure of certain portions of the report.
5. Argue waiver of privilege: If the hospital or its staff have disclosed the contents of the incident report to third parties or put the report at issue in the litigation, they may have waived the privilege.
It's important to note that overcoming the Section 1157 privilege can be challenging, and the specific strategies will depend on the facts of the case. An experienced medical malpractice attorney can help navigate these issues and develop the best approach for obtaining relevant information.
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.