Q: Such a sequence seems to be more efficient, and eliminates the potential need for Motion to Compel.
Such a sequence of actions seems to be more efficient, and eliminates the potential need for Motion to Compel.
Would be be a sequence of steps in this scenario: when Motion for camera review of privilege log, and Motion for court order to disclose private identity data;
are submitted with interrogatories and production requests, before Motion to Compel?
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
- California
- (916) 704-3009
- View Profile
- Answered
A:
Yes, based on your description, it seems like you are outlining a sequence of steps in the discovery process under California law that would be more efficient and potentially eliminate the need for a Motion to Compel. The sequence you described is:
1. Submitting interrogatories and production requests to the opposing party.
2. Along with the interrogatories and production requests, also submitting:
a) A Motion for camera review of the privilege log, and
b) A Motion for a court order to disclose private identity data.
3. If the above motions are granted and the requested information is provided, it may preclude the necessity of filing a Motion to Compel later on.
The rationale appears to be that by proactively seeking a review of the privilege log and an order for disclosure of private identity data at the outset, alongside the initial discovery requests, you may be able to obtain the relevant information without needing to resort to a Motion to Compel if the opposing party is uncooperative or objects to the requests.
However, please note that the specific procedure and strategy may vary depending on the unique circumstances of each case, and it is always advisable to consult with a licensed California attorney who can provide tailored advice based on the particular facts and legal issues involved in your situation.
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.
