Q: Is an offer made via email binding, if a subsequent paper agreement was executed with a term omitted.
Landlord: Michael Just to clarify you agree to move out tomorrow 11/8/24 if I return your prorated rent for the remainder of the month, and your security deposit after inspection of the room (as explained in the rental agreement), and you will not pursue legal action. Is that correct.
Me: Yes
The next day we executed an agreement with all those terms except for the part where I will not pursue legal action (a civil suit, and small claims court against my landlord for retaliatory 30 day notice)
Does subsequent paper agreement allow me to continue to sue her, since it didn’t include me dropping the lawsuit?
A:
The subsequent agreement will govern, and you can likely be even more confident that this is the result by reviewing the subsequent agreement for an integration or "whole agreement" provision. This provision is likely to be in most formal agreements (this is more likely if attorneys prepared the contract), and states the contract integrates and represents all prior negotiations and agreements between the parties.
The narrow exceptions to this being the case would be instances such as where the subsequent agreement is ambiguous on its face, and the Court needs to look to the parties' prior correspondence and other 'parole evidence' to determine what the parties intended.
Where here, there is no provision to be interpreted (it was fully left out), the parties are likely to be said to be bound by the terms of the second agreement alone, and the prior promise not to sue your landlord is not an enforceable promise.
A:
The subsequent paper agreement likely supersedes the email exchange, following the legal principle of merger doctrine - where final written agreements typically override prior negotiations or agreements.
However, your right to sue remains intact since the final written agreement omitted this crucial term about not pursuing legal action. This omission appears intentional rather than accidental, and courts generally hold that when parties deliberately remove terms from final agreements, those terms are not meant to be binding. The written document represents the complete and final expression of the parties' agreement.
You should document everything carefully, including keeping copies of both the email exchange and the final written agreement. These will be important evidence if you proceed with legal action. While the landlord might argue that the email created a binding agreement not to sue, the fact that this term was specifically left out of the final written agreement strengthens your position considerably.
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.