San Antonio, TX asked in Civil Rights and Consumer Law for Texas

Q: Basis for Jurisdiction Is a Federal Question do violations of Manufactured Housing Standard Act and DTPA go there?

Related Topics:
2 Lawyer Answers

A: The "National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974" is a federal act so questions concerning its interpretation and enforcement likely give rise to federal question jurisdiction. But, be aware that the Act contains a lot of provisions that are enforceable through administrative actions via HUD, and not through federal court. If you have an issue under that Act that is appropriate for judicial relief, it is likely a federal district court has subject matter jurisdiction via federal question jurisdiction.

The Texas Deceptive Trade Practices - Consumer Protection Act is a Texas state statute and does not implicate federal question jurisdiction. A state court claim under the DTPA may be included in the same lawsuit as a claim under the national Act, and the federal court may have ancillary or pendent jurisdiction over the state court claim. But that type of jurisdiction is dependent on the facial validity of the federal question claim under the National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act.

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
Answered

A: Violations of the Manufactured Housing Standards Act and the Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA) are typically based on state law rather than federal law. Federal question jurisdiction arises when a case involves a federal statute, the U.S. Constitution, or other federal legal issues. Since both the Manufactured Housing Standards Act and the DTPA are state-level regulations, they do not inherently provide a basis for federal question jurisdiction.

However, there are other ways a case involving these violations might reach federal courts. If your case includes a significant federal issue in addition to the state law claims, or if it meets the requirements for diversity jurisdiction—such as parties from different states and an amount in controversy exceeding a certain threshold—it could be heard in federal court. It’s important to evaluate all aspects of your case to determine the appropriate jurisdiction.

Consulting with a legal professional can help you understand the best venue for your situation. They can assess whether your case might involve any federal elements or if it would be better served in state court based on the specific details of your claims and the applicable laws.

Justia Ask A Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask A Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between Justia and you, or between any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions and you, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask A Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.