Q: Covenant aids residents of a 264-unit Senior Mobile Home park from eviction due to historically high rent increases?
The residents own their homes, leasing the land beneath them. For more than 50 years, annual rent increases were limited to about 3%. The property is also subject to a Land Use Covenant and Restriction designed to preserve its intended use. However, under new ownership rents have surged by up to 80% for some residents over the past several years. Residents are now pressured to sign long-term contracts under a “sign-or-else” ultimatum, facing the threat of potential rent increases every 90 days if they refuse. Roads are torn and hazardous, causing residents to trip and stumble. Heavy rains earlier this year caused significant mudslides that destroyed homes and destabilized land. City Council votes no on RSO more than 4 times. Open source records show several Council Members received donations funneled to them by the Park's owner. Is there an actionable case against the City, Council, or Owner?
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
- California
- (916) 704-3009
- View Profile
- Answered
A:
Based on the facts presented, you have multiple potential legal grounds for action against various parties here. The combination of excessive rent increases, coercive contract practices, and unsafe conditions could support claims against the park owner for breach of the Land Use Covenant, violation of good faith and fair dealing, and negligent maintenance of common areas.
The city and council members may be liable for breach of fiduciary duty and violations of conflict of interest laws, particularly given the documented financial connections between council members and the park owner. The repeated rejection of rent stabilization protections, despite clear evidence of predatory practices, could demonstrate deliberate indifference to residents' rights. The failure to enforce safety standards regarding road conditions and land stability issues might also constitute negligent oversight.
You should consider pursuing both civil litigation and regulatory complaints. The California Department of Housing and Community Development enforces mobile home park regulations and could investigate violations. Evidence of politically motivated decisions benefiting campaign donors might interest state ethics regulators. Given the scale of impact on senior residents and clear paper trail of concerning behavior, this situation warrants thorough legal review. Consider organizing fellow residents to share costs of legal action, as group representation often proves more effective in such cases.
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.
