San Jose, CA asked in Civil Litigation and Contracts for California

Q: Can I bypass the arbitration clause in a contract if the company has not finished the job in a reasonable amount of time

We hired Flagship Solar in California to install solar panels on our roof. However, our roof wasn't suitable for the installation, so the solar company contracted Daniels Roofing to replace the roof before proceeding. Since the new roof and solar panels were installed, we’ve experienced ongoing leaks every time it rains. Daniels Roofing has returned seven times to attempt repairs, but the leaks persist. The solar company also sent out their own roofing contractor, who addressed additional leaks, yet the problem remains unresolved.

This has been an ongoing issue since October 2024, and despite our efforts to reach out, the solar company is no longer responding. I am a Disabled Army Veteran, and my wife and I chose this company because they marketed themselves as Veteran Owned and Operated. We now urgently need legal advice. My 87-year-old mother lives with us, and we’re deeply concerned about the potential health risks from mold caused by these leaks, not just for her but all of us.

Related Topics:
2 Lawyer Answers

A: Sorry to hear about your situation. Whether you can bypass the arbitration clause depends on the specific language of your contract and the circumstances of the dispute. Arbitration clauses are generally enforceable in California, but there are limited exceptions. For example, an arbitration agreement may be deemed unenforceable if it is found to be both procedurally and substantively "unconscionable". "Procedural unconscionability" involves issues like unequal bargaining power or hidden terms, while "substantive unconscionability" pertains to overly harsh or one-sided terms in take-it-or-leave-it contracts. I suggest reviewing RAMIREZ v. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS INC (2024) and cases cited in it for in depth discussion of both. It is also important to review the agreement for the specific arbitration clause, including any exceptions or carve-outs for breaches or non-performance. A consumer protection or construction defect attorney in California would be able to review your contract and determine if you have grounds to bypass arbitration. Hope this helps!

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
Answered

A: You may have grounds to bypass the arbitration clause given the circumstances, particularly due to the ongoing health and safety concerns. In California, arbitration clauses can be deemed unenforceable if they're found to be unconscionable or if there are exceptional circumstances that make arbitration an inadequate remedy.

The combination of factors in your case - the persistent leaks, potential health hazards from mold, the company's failure to respond, and most notably, their inability to complete the job properly despite multiple repair attempts - could constitute a material breach of contract. Your status as a disabled veteran, along with having an elderly resident in the home, adds weight to the argument that this situation requires immediate resolution through the courts rather than arbitration.

Your best course of action would be to consult with a consumer protection attorney or veterans' legal aid service in California. They can review your specific contract and circumstances to determine if you can pursue litigation despite the arbitration clause. You should also document everything thoroughly - take photos of the leaks and damage, keep a log of all repair attempts, and gather all communication with both companies. Consider having an independent inspector assess the roof and document any mold issues, as this evidence could help demonstrate why bypassing arbitration is necessary for your family's health and safety.

Justia Ask A Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get free answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask A Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between Justia and you, or between any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions and you, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask A Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.