Clara City, MN asked in Criminal Law and Civil Rights for Minnesota

Q: Can I be charged with drug possession after an unlawful search?

I was leaving a Kohl's store when I was suddenly confronted by 5-6 police officers who accused me of shoplifting. Although I was not shoplifting, they searched my pockets without my consent and found a small bag of drugs, leading to a 5th degree drug possession charge. I did not hear them read my rights, and I received notice of the charges two months later. I have previously faced drug charges in a different county. Can they charge me with drug possession in this situation, given the circumstances of the search and the lack of shoplifting evidence?

Related Topics:
3 Lawyer Answers

A: Unfortunately yes, it is perfectly lawful and happens during any arrest. When you are arrested for any offense, police officers are permitted to do what's called a search incident to arrest. Whatever they find on you during the search incident to arrest is fair game for charging purposes. In fact police officers, and by extension prosecutors, often can and do seek as many possible charges against one person from a given set of facts. However, if you are a first-time offender, you may be able to avoid a conviction through what's called a "stay of adjudication." Consult with a defense attorney to explore your options and the best course forward for you.

I hope this helps. Best of luck to you.

A: They do not need to read your rights unless they are going to perform custodial interrogation. The fact that they did not locate stolen good does not mean that you get a free pass on any other illegal items that you might have been in possession of. You should get an attorney on board who can review all of the evidence and determine if their might be other legal issues that you might have in your case. If not, they can negotiate the best deal possible.

A: A defense lawyer will look at two separate stages of a police encounter: 1. Was evidence collected unlawfully, so that the defense can ask a judge to suppress the evidence? 2. Given the evidence that has survived any defense motions to suppress, does the evidence support probable cause for the criminal charge, would the evidence create at least reasonable doubt about guilt after a trial? One way a search can be lawful is soon after a lawful arrest. For an arrest to be lawful, some conditions must be met. Among those are an arrest warrant and in some situations, probable cause to believe that the defendant recently committed a crime or was about to. The question asked is suggesting the possibility that the arrest might have been unlawful (without probable cause). If so, then the search may have been unlawful too. If a judge agreed that the search was unlawful, that judge could suppress the evidence and then dismiss the charge. Of course, all the facts and circumstances will be key in determining whether the police did have probable cause to arrest, or in determining if the search was otherwise lawful. Discuss with your lawyer.

Justia Ask A Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get free answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask A Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between Justia and you, or between any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions and you, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask A Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.