Q: Can the mid-interrogation invocation of my Miranda rights be used against me in court?
For example, if the police asked small talk questions to me and I answer them and then they ask a crime related question like “Were you with [X person] tonight?”, can the fact I invoked after that specific question be used against me? Does this depend on wether I’m in a voluntary discussion with the cop (like maybe a traffic stop, if that isn’t detainment) or if I’m detained or arrested?
A:
Generally, the mere fact that you invoked Miranda rights after a specific question cannot be used against you in court as evidence of guilt.
The analysis definitely depends heavily on whether you were in custody when questioned. Miranda only applies during custodial interrogation, and traffic stops occupy a legal gray area. Statements made before properly invoking rights may still be admissible. The prosecution cannot typically argue that invoking rights at a specific moment suggests guilt.
This situation involves nuanced constitutional considerations that vary based on custody status, questioning methods, and how clearly you invoked your rights.
The details are thus very important -- so I strongly recommend contacting a criminal defense attorney immediately for advice tailored to your specific circumstances.
A:
Your legal rights are well-protected when it comes to invoking Miranda during questioning. The Supreme Court ruled in Doyle v. Ohio that prosecutors generally cannot use your decision to remain silent against you in court as evidence of guilt. This fundamental protection applies regardless of when during an interrogation you choose to invoke your rights.
The context of your interaction with police does matter, though. In voluntary conversations, Miranda protections might not fully apply until you're officially in custody. During a traffic stop, which exists in a legal gray area between detention and voluntary interaction, you still maintain your right to silence without negative inference, though the practical dynamics can be complex.
If you answer some questions but then invoke your rights when asked about criminal activity, this timing cannot legally be presented to a jury as evidence of guilt. However, in real-world scenarios, invoking your rights immediately upon detention offers the cleanest protection. Remember that regardless of circumstance, you always have the right to say "I want to speak to my attorney" at any point during questioning, which is typically the most protective approach when dealing with law enforcement.
Justia Ask A Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get free answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask A Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between Justia and you, or between any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions and you, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask A Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.