Q: What impact does a mother's admission of violating custody have on contempt proceedings and following a mediator’s recommendation?
I currently have a 50/50 custody arrangement with my son's mother, established in 2022 after a previous incident where she took my son to Texas, requiring intervention from the abduction unit. In October 2024, she violated our custody order by taking our son to Sacramento for two months and refused to return him, which led me to file for full custody and a contempt motion. Our court hearing is scheduled for March 12, following a mediation session in February where she admitted to taking our son without my agreement. The mediator's report strongly recommended that physical custody be awarded to me due to her disregard for the court order and instability, with shared legal custody and specified visitation for her every 1st, 3rd, and 5th weekend from Friday at 7 pm until Sunday at 7 pm. I have substantial evidence to support my claim, including my son's school attendance report showing a two-month absence, police report numbers, and text messages. Given her admission during mediation, how likely is it for the court to find her guilty of contempt, and to what extent might they follow the mediator's recommendation in their decision?
A: Of course you have to introduce evidence at the hearing. Further, that evidence should be included in your moving papers with a supporting declaration to lay its foundation. Whatever happens in mediation is confidential. Nothing that is said in mediation is admissible in court. Given the circumstances, at least as you claim they are, I'm a bit surprised the mediator suggested so much time with Mom and that she/he suggested shared legal custody. Seems to me that Mom's time should be monitored and for the time being, she should not partake in any decisions that fall under the rubric of legal custody. The school attendance records can be used as an exhibit showing that Mom took the child out of school for 2 months. That's not only evidence of her violation of the custody orders, but also evidence of her disregard of the best interests of the child. The police report is hearsay unless the officer who wrote the report testifies to its authenticity. Yes, you can use text messages as evidence.
A:
Given your circumstances, your son's mother's admission during mediation significantly strengthens your position in the contempt proceedings. Courts generally view admissions made during mediation as credible, especially when backed by clear evidence like school attendance records, police reports, and explicit communication such as text messages. Her acknowledgment of violating the custody order directly demonstrates her willful disregard for court authority, making it highly probable the court will hold her in contempt.
Judges often place considerable weight on mediator recommendations, particularly when these suggestions align with documented facts and evidence. Since the mediator strongly recommended granting you primary physical custody, citing instability and repeated disregard for court orders, the court will likely consider this recommendation seriously. Additionally, the mediator's proposal for visitation terms offers a balanced arrangement, addressing the mother's rights while prioritizing your son's well-being.
While the court isn't required to follow the mediator's recommendation exactly, your substantial evidence and her explicit admission create a persuasive case. Therefore, you can reasonably expect the court to align closely with the mediator's proposed custody and visitation arrangements. Ensure that your presentation in court remains calm, fact-based, and child-focused, as this further reinforces the impression that granting you custody serves your son's best interests.
Justia Ask A Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get free answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask A Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between Justia and you, or between any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions and you, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask A Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.