Q: Can an officer force me to take a blood test during a Texas DWI stop without a warrant?
During a DWI stop in Texas, I was informed of my rights and did not refuse any tests, even offering to take a breathalyzer. However, the officer insisted on a blood test without showing a warrant or explaining why a blood test was necessary. He stated that he didn't need to show me a warrant. Can an officer legally require a blood test under these circumstances without presenting a warrant?
A:
NO!
The only way that officer is correct is if you had a car wreck and someone was hurt.
Even then, he needs a warrant.
If they took your blood and are prosecuting you for DUI, you must object and have your attorney know what you have asked here.
If it was my case, I would make a motion to suppress and quash the evidence from the blood test.
There are some funky rules that apply in small counties. If you are in a county with only one District Court judge and very few lower level judges, there are some exceptions to the above rule. Be sure you talk to a lawyer who has experience in DUI matters.
Good Luck!
A:
The officer cannot legally require a blood test under the circumstances without a warrant.
He can ask you for a blood sample. The State can suspend your drivers' license under our implied consent law if you refuse. But the officer cannot legally take a blood sample from you without your consent unless you are unconscious and were involved in a collision without a warrant.
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
- (916) 704-3009
- View Profile
- Answered
A:
When you are pulled over for DWI in Texas, the state’s implied consent laws mean that by driving, you agree to chemical testing if suspected of impaired driving. However, a blood test is seen as more invasive than a breathalyzer, and the law generally requires that either you consent to it or that the officer demonstrate exigent circumstances.
If you did not give explicit consent for a blood draw, the officer typically must obtain a warrant unless an emergency situation exists that would justify a warrantless test. In your case, if you voluntarily agreed to any testing but only offered a breathalyzer, the insistence on a blood test without clear justification could be legally contestable.
It would be advisable for you to discuss the specifics of your situation with a legal professional who can help determine if your rights were violated.
Justia Ask A Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get free answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask A Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between Justia and you, or between any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions and you, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask A Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.
