Q: What are my next steps for an ER misdiagnosis of a knee fracture leading to surgery?
I injured my right knee and visited the emergency room twice, first on 2/23/25 and then on 2/25/25. Initially, I was told there was no fracture, and I was diagnosed with fluid in my knee. I was prescribed pain medication and crutches and advised to see an orthopedic specialist. Unable to bear any weight on my right knee, I sought another ER opinion on 2/25/25, which also reported no fracture. Finally, after obtaining a referral and visiting an orthopedic on 3/6/25, I was diagnosed with a fracture and informed I required surgery. I've since had surgery and will need physical therapy. Since my injury, I've been unable to work or perform daily tasks as I'm still unable to walk. I have the medical records from the ER visits, but I'm unsure why the fracture was missed during those initial assessments. What should my next steps be regarding this misdiagnosis and its impact on my life?
A:
It may be a case. Medical malpractice means that a doctor violated the standard of care. A bad outcome is not enough. Another doctor would be needed to evaluate what the doctors did.
Viable malpractice cases require sufficient harm, breach of the standard of care and timely filing of a lawsuit.
Tim Akpinar agrees with this answer
A: If multiple doctors missed it, I will estimate that it was hard to diagnose. Also, it is unclear what the impact of the misdiagnosis is. The impact appears to be caused by the fracture, rather than a misdiagnosis. Consult with a medical malpractice attorney for specific advise about your potential claims. Or, if someone else is at fault for causing the fracture, consult with a personal injury attorney about pursuing a claim against that person.
Tim Akpinar agrees with this answer
A:
Your situation involving missed fracture diagnoses at the emergency room may constitute medical negligence under California law. The foundation of such cases requires establishing that the healthcare providers deviated from the accepted standard of care when they failed to identify your fracture during two separate ER visits, directly resulting in delayed treatment, additional surgery, and significant life disruptions.
Your immediate priority should be comprehensive documentation gathering - collect all medical records from both emergency room visits, the orthopedic consultation, surgical reports, and ongoing physical therapy documentation. Request your radiology images and reports from each visit, as these will be crucial for expert review to determine why the fracture was initially missed. Track all expenses related to your injury, including medical bills, prescription costs, transportation to appointments, and calculate lost wages from your inability to work during this extended recovery period.
California maintains a statute of limitations of one year from discovery of medical negligence or three years from the date of injury, whichever occurs first, making timely consultation with an attorney experienced in medical malpractice essential. A qualified attorney will arrange for medical expert review of your records to determine if the standard of care was breached and guide you through the complex pre-litigation requirements unique to California medical malpractice claims, including the mandatory 90-day notice to healthcare providers before filing a lawsuit. Many attorneys handling these cases work on contingency fees, meaning no upfront costs while they investigate whether your case meets the legal threshold for pursuing compensation for your additional medical expenses, extended pain and suffering, and lost income resulting from this apparent diagnostic failure.
Tim Akpinar agrees with this answer
Justia Ask A Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get free answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask A Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between Justia and you, or between any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions and you, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask A Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.