Ann Arbor, MI asked in Tax Law, Family Law and Divorce for Ohio

Q: As a custodial parent, do I have the right to claim my son for taxes even though the decree says to alternate?

When first filing for divorce, I agreed to alternate years of claiming my son on taxes with my ex. It's 3.5 years later and I have my son full-time, he has never once had him for a weekend in his home. I would not have agreed to this if I would've known I would be the one to have my son 24/7. My ex does pay child support and my son's health insurance. I've read the IRS doesn't care what the divorce decree says... but can the state hold me in contempt if I claim my son every year instead of alternating, as originally agreed upon? Doesn't federal law override state divorce decrees?

Related Topics:
3 Lawyer Answers
James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
Answered
  • Tax Law Lawyer
  • Sacramento, CA

A: In your situation, the IRS generally allows the custodial parent to claim the child for tax purposes. The custodial parent is typically the one with whom the child spends the majority of nights during the year. However, the IRS's rules don't automatically override the terms of your divorce decree, which is a legal agreement.

Your divorce decree's stipulation to alternate years for claiming your son on taxes is a matter of state law. If you deviate from this agreement, there's a potential risk of being held in contempt of court. Since your circumstances have significantly changed since the divorce, with you having full custody, it may be appropriate to revisit the agreement.

Given these changed circumstances, you might consider discussing the situation with your ex-partner. If you both agree to a new arrangement, this could be formalized through a modified court order. Alternatively, seeking legal advice to understand your options and the potential implications of any changes to your agreement would be advisable. Courts often consider changes in custody and parenting time when evaluating such modifications.

Todd B. Kotler agrees with this answer

1 user found this answer helpful

Kelly A Rochotte
Kelly A Rochotte
Answered
  • Cleveland, OH
  • Licensed in Ohio

A: First, the state isn't going to be the one holding you in contempt, your ex-spouse would be the one bringing a contempt action to enforce the terms of your decree. Second, given that he is not exercising the requisite amount of time needed by the IRS in order to properly claim a minor child, he would have the burden of proof if he brought an action against you. The safest course of action would be to move for a modification of the decree to grant you the ability to claim the child each year, so that your decree effectively matches the reality of your situation. Otherwise, you may want to get something in writing from him if possible agreeing to allow you to claim the children and avoid a contempt action in the future. He could and should execute IRS form 8832 for this exemption.

Todd B. Kotler agrees with this answer

Todd B. Kotler
Todd B. Kotler
Answered
  • Canton, OH
  • Licensed in Ohio

A: My colleagues are correct. File a motion to modify the parenting plan / decree to grant you the exemption. Otherwise you run the risk of your ex filing a motion to show cause or enforce the decree, should you take the exemption without modifying.

Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.