Murrieta, CA asked in Criminal Law, Animal / Dog Law and Civil Rights for California

Q: Can surveillance in a private area of my yard be admissible in court?

Neighbor recorded us on surveillance having a private conversation in an area of our yard not otherwise publicly visible. They did record my spouse hitting my dog and submitted that to animal control. My husband went to jail for 5 days, but they released him and did not charge him yet. The dogs are under my familys custody for now. Its been 3mo. Can this footage be inadmissable based on privacy?

1 Lawyer Answer
James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
Answered
  • Criminal Law Lawyer
  • Sacramento, CA
  • Licensed in California

A: In California, the admissibility of surveillance footage from a private area of your yard depends on several factors and the specific circumstances of the case. Here are some key points to consider:

1. Reasonable expectation of privacy: If the area where the conversation took place was not visible from public vantage points and you had a reasonable expectation of privacy, the footage might be considered an invasion of privacy and could be inadmissible in court.

2. California's two-party consent law: California is a "two-party consent" state, meaning that all parties must consent to the recording of confidential conversations. If your conversation was confidential and your neighbor recorded it without your knowledge or consent, the footage might be inadmissible.

3. Evidence of a crime: If the footage shows evidence of a crime, such as animal abuse, it may be admissible in court, even if it was obtained in violation of privacy laws. This is because the public interest in prosecuting crimes may outweigh the individual's right to privacy.

4. Fourth Amendment protections: The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. If the police or animal control obtained the footage without a warrant or a valid exception to the warrant requirement, the footage could be deemed inadmissible.

Ultimately, the admissibility of the surveillance footage will depend on the specific facts of your case and how the footage was obtained. It is essential to consult with a criminal defense attorney who can evaluate your case, assess the admissibility of the evidence, and develop a strong defense strategy. An attorney can also help you navigate the legal process and protect your rights.

Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.