Q: Can the owner of property/business be liable for inadequate security if victim was shot on premises?
A: The owner of property is only liable for injury resulting from a dangerous condition on their property of which they were aware or reasonably should have been aware. So if it can be shown by the victim that the owner was aware of a dangerous condition that posed a significant risk of injury and that the owner was either aware of the condition or with reasonable diligence should have been aware of it, then the owner may be held liable for the injuries caused by that condition.
James Otto Heiting agrees with this answer
A:
the correct answer is "it depends"............on the FACTS.
if the owner allowed a dangerous condition, s/he may be liable.
the best thing is to make an appt with a LOCAL lawyer to share ALL the facts.
James Otto Heiting agrees with this answer
A: Potentially, but there are a lot of facts that have to be known to make a property owner liable for the shooting death of a visitor, assuming that the property owner didn't pull the trigger. Your question requires a long consultation and probably some detective work about the history of the property.
James Otto Heiting agrees with this answer
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
- California
- (916) 704-3009
- View Profile
- Answered
A: Yes, the owner of a property or business can be liable for inadequate security if a victim is shot on the premises. The owner has a duty to provide a safe environment for visitors and customers. If the owner fails to take reasonable steps to provide adequate security measures, such as installing security cameras or hiring security personnel, and someone is injured or killed as a result, the owner may be held liable for the victim's damages. However, the specific circumstances of the incident would need to be examined to determine the extent of the owner's liability. It is important to consult with a legal professional who is familiar with the relevant laws in your area if you believe you have a case.
James Otto Heiting agrees with this answer
A: The short answer is, Yes, they can be liable under appropriate circumstances. The injured party (or heirs) should contact a lawyer experienced in this type of law asap. The lawyers will need to get documents and do some investigation if they are interested; and strict time limits apply.
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.
