Rochester, NH asked in Contracts, Family Law and Landlord - Tenant for Massachusetts

Q: Co-tenants signed lease together and are breaking up.

Our daughter and boyfriend signed a housing lease. 4 months remain. Our minor grandson (10) visits and stays in his own room on the weekends. The boyfriend states his financial obligation moving forward, will be 1/3 of the rent. The boyfriend did make less money than our daughter when they signed, and she has, during the past months, paid more than her 50% share of the rent obligation. Her situation changed, and they both currently have the same weekly income level. Our question is, because our grandson has his own room there, is our daughter legally responsible for more than 50% of the rent? There wasn't a rental agreement between the two as to who would pay what. Only that she made more money at the time of signing the lease. The lease does not state her increased input towards the final monthly obligation. Any advice would be appreciated. They lease in Massachusetts. Thank you!

2 Lawyer Answers

A: I assume the lease states your daughter and the boyfriend are 'jointly and severally' liable for the rent. This means that each is liable for the entire rent. In the event of dispute, the landlord can seek the entire rent from either your daughter or the boyfriend or both. I don't think this makes your daughter liable for greater rent because your grandson resides with her.

I don't think your daughter is legally liable for more rent because the grandson resides in the premises. The division of rent liability is a matter of decision between the boyfriend and your daughter. I assume your grandson has been residing in his room at the premises since the beginning of the lease. The parties informal arrangement on who was responsible for what percentage of rent was driven by their respective incomes, not whether your grandson resided in the premises. Your daughter did not initially pay more because your grandson had a room, she paid more because she had more money. Since the grandson's presence or absence was never part of the calculation of who pays what rent, it should not be now.

1 user found this answer helpful

A: Most leases have joint and several liability so that each lessee is really responsible for the whole rent to the Lessor.

Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.