If a case is to be heard in a district federal court, but the defendants are considered "assigned" to the district

Question

Under certain commissions, therefore are sometimes witnesses to prosecuting cases, is that enough to file in a separate district or as an original proceeding in the tenth circuit?

James L. Arrasmith · Answer

In the scenario you're describing, where defendants are frequently involved in prosecuting cases in a specific district federal court, concerns about potential conflicts of interest or bias might arise. These concerns can be a valid basis to request a change of venue or to file in a different district. 
 
However, simply being 'assigned' to a district or having a role as witnesses in prosecutions does not automatically qualify as a sufficient reason for such a change. The decision to grant a change of venue or to allow filing in a different district or circuit court depends on demonstrating that a fair and impartial trial cannot be held in the original venue. 
 
If you believe there's a significant conflict of interest or bias, you should file a motion to change venue, outlining your concerns and reasons why a different district or circuit would be more appropriate. This motion would typically be filed in the original district court where the case is set to be heard. 
 
It's crucial to provide concrete evidence or arguments to support your claim that a fair trial cannot be ensured in the original venue. The decision will ultimately be at the discretion of the court, based on the evidence and arguments presented.

Q: If a case is to be heard in a district federal court, but the defendants are considered "assigned" to the district