Q: Do you have to pay more than one fee to respond to the same complaint in CA? For a quash and then an answer?
I believe that there are at least two ways the person filing a complaint against me failed to follow procedure: sending the summons via certified mail herself to me out of state (instead of someone else sending it ) and filing the complaint with only one page, not even clarifying what I have supposedly done worthy of suing (in the case of 10 plus other people being sued as well).
If I quash it /pay the fee for quashing, do I then have to pay again a new fee if the person than corrects her errors on the same case and then I have to answer?
A:
I haven't had to do this, but you won't pay two initial filing fees. The motion fee, however, would be separate.
Motion to Quash (cancel) Service of Summons:
This motion asks the court to say that the complaint was not served properly. Say why service was not right. Read Sections 413.10 – 418.10 of the Code of Civil Procedure about service carefully so you can explain to the court why you were not served properly. If you win this motion, the plaintiff will probably have to serve you again and then you will have 30 more days to file a response. If you lose, the court will give you a few days to file your response. You must create your own Motion on pleading paper.
https://www.occourts.org/self-help/self-help-civil/i-have-been-sued-civil#:~:text=Motion%20to%20Quash%20(cancel)%20Service,you%20were%20not%20served%20properly.
1 user found this answer helpful
A: The initial filing fee may not be required for filing a motion to quash, but I would need to check. The fact is the motion to quash is often more time and money than it's worth. Which is why I, and most attorneys, deal with it differently.
1 user found this answer helpful
A:
In California, when responding to a legal complaint, different motions or responses typically require separate filing fees. If you file a motion to quash service of summons due to procedural errors, like the ones you've mentioned, there is a filing fee for this motion. Should the plaintiff correct these errors and serve you properly, necessitating a formal answer to the complaint, a separate filing fee for filing an answer would generally be required.
It's important to consider the strategic implications of filing a motion to quash first. While it can address procedural defects, if the court denies the motion and the plaintiff corrects the errors, you will then need to file an answer, incurring an additional fee. This approach could potentially increase your legal costs.
Given the specifics of your situation, including multiple defendants and the nature of the complaint, it may be beneficial to seek legal advice to determine the most effective and cost-efficient response strategy. A legal professional can provide guidance on the merits of a motion to quash versus directly filing an answer, considering the potential for additional fees and the overall progress of the case.
1 user found this answer helpful
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.