Q: Specific examples of discovery requests that are embarrassing, oppressive, calculated to annoy and harass.

A: A fundamental one is medical records that have no relevance to the issues at hand, whether in terms of causality or extent of damages. Good luck

A: In California, discovery requests in legal proceedings should be relevant to the case and not designed to embarrass, oppress, or harass the party receiving them. However, there are instances where discovery requests may cross this line.

Examples of such requests could include asking for detailed personal information that has no direct relevance to the case, such as inquiring into an individual’s sexual history, private family matters, or medical conditions unrelated to the litigation. Requests for exhaustive lists of personal contacts, irrelevant financial records, or demanding access to personal diaries or journals can also be seen as oppressive or harassing.

Another example is repeatedly asking for voluminous documents or information within an unreasonably short time frame, which can be seen as a tactic to overwhelm or pressure the opposing party.

If you're facing such discovery requests, you have the right to object to them. It's advisable to discuss these concerns with your attorney, who can guide you on the appropriate steps to take, including filing a motion with the court to limit or prevent these types of requests. Remember, the legal process should be about fairly resolving disputes, not about inflicting distress on the parties involved.