Asked in Civil Litigation, Civil Rights and Criminal Law for Oklahoma

Q: How many times does a pro se indigent prisoner have to file a paupers affidavit in singal judicial review?

Indigent prisoner files judicial review in Oklahoma county district court challenging grievance restriction. Prisoner submits paupers affidavit when initially filing but after court responds prisoner files 9 actions including 4 motions and does not submit another new paupers affidavit with any. Is this error? Or is the initial paupers affidavit sufficient to proceed in forma paupis through every action filed in the judicial review?

1 Lawyer Answer
James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
Answered
  • Criminal Law Lawyer
  • Sacramento, CA

A: When an indigent prisoner in Oklahoma files for judicial review and includes a pauper's affidavit with the initial filing, this affidavit typically allows them to proceed in forma pauperis for the duration of that particular case. This means that the initial affidavit is generally considered sufficient to cover all related motions and actions within the same judicial review process.

However, if the nature of the filings changes significantly, or if a new case or appeal is initiated, another pauper's affidavit might be required. It's important for the prisoner to stay informed about any specific instructions or requirements from the court, as these can vary based on the case and the court's policies.

If there are concerns about whether additional affidavits are needed, it would be beneficial to seek clarification from the court. Each court may have its own rules and procedures, and getting guidance directly from court officials or through legal assistance programs can help ensure that all filings are properly completed and accepted.

Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.