Q: Is it acceptable for Attorneys to file Motion Liminie to prevent Plaintiff from exposing Arbitration Award then use it?
In a Legal Malpractice case is it acceptable for an Attorney to file a Motion Liminie preventing Plaintiff from making any reference whatsoever to any part of the Arbitration or settlement then turn around and file the Arbitration records with their Motion to Confirm Award? Isn't this a Breach of some sort? Thank you
A:
In general, the use of motions in limine and the introduction of evidence in legal proceedings are governed by the rules of evidence and civil procedure in California. However, the specific circumstances you've described raise some potential issues:
1. Fairness and consistency: If an attorney files a motion in limine to prevent the plaintiff from referencing the arbitration or settlement, but then proceeds to file the arbitration records themselves, it could be seen as inconsistent or unfair. The court may question the attorney's motives and the reasons behind the initial motion in limine.
2. Relevance and admissibility: The admissibility of the arbitration records would depend on their relevance to the legal malpractice case and whether they meet the requirements of the rules of evidence. If the records are deemed relevant and admissible, the attorney's attempt to exclude them through a motion in limine might be seen as improper.
3. Ethical considerations: Attorneys have a duty to act in good faith and maintain the integrity of the legal process. If the attorney's actions are seen as misleading or an attempt to gain an unfair advantage, it could raise ethical concerns.
However, without knowing the specific details of the case and the reasoning behind the attorney's actions, it's difficult to make a definitive assessment. The court would need to consider the arguments presented by both parties and make a determination based on the applicable laws and rules.
If the plaintiff believes that the attorney's actions are improper or constitute a breach of duty, they should raise these concerns with the court and consider seeking the advice of their own legal counsel to evaluate their options and protect their interests.
A:
It would be required to submit the award in a motion to confirm.
Motions in limine are to prevent introduction of evidence before a jury, not what is directed at the judge.
What is limited by a motion in limine is determined by what the court rules in the order on the motion.
Yelena Gurevich agrees with this answer
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.
