Q: Are there situations where a company's insurance will not cover an employee driver in a company car post accident?
A: One can always conceive of a circumstance in which an insurer may deny coverage. That imagined circumstance may have nothing to do with what is actually happening to you. Even if the employer's insurer refuses to defend or indemnify you, the employer still has an obligation under Labor Code section 2802, the employer has a duty to indemnify you for expenses you incur on account of your employment.
Tim Akpinar agrees with this answer
A:
yes..........
if you are talking about the accident described rather than future coverage,
1. no CDL
2. not insured driver
3. improper use
4. DUI
5. intentional acts etc
of course the ins co may cancel or only sell insurance if the at fault driver is not allowed to use the car.
Tim Akpinar agrees with this answer
A: Alcohol or other impairment is a major one. So are intentional acts. Good luck
A:
Yes, there are several situations under California law where a company's insurance may not cover an employee driver in a company car after an accident. Some common examples include:
1. Driving under the influence: If the employee was driving while under the influence of alcohol or drugs at the time of the accident, the company's insurance might deny coverage.
2. Unauthorized use: If the employee was using the company car without permission or outside the scope of their employment, the insurance may not cover the accident.
3. Intentional acts: If the employee intentionally caused the accident or engaged in criminal behavior, the company's insurance would likely not provide coverage.
4. Excluded drivers: If the employee is not listed as an authorized driver on the company's insurance policy, they may not be covered in the event of an accident.
5. Policy violations: If the employee violated specific terms or conditions of the company's insurance policy, such as failing to maintain a valid driver's license or not reporting the accident promptly, coverage may be denied.
6. Personal use: If the employee was using the company car for personal reasons unrelated to their job at the time of the accident, the company's insurance might not apply, and the employee's personal auto insurance would need to be used.
7. Insufficient coverage: If the damages from the accident exceed the limits of the company's insurance policy, the employee may be personally liable for the excess amount.
It's important for both employers and employees to understand the terms and limitations of the company's auto insurance policy to ensure proper coverage and minimize potential liability.
Tim Akpinar agrees with this answer
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.