San Clemente, CA asked in Arbitration / Mediation Law and Legal Malpractice for California

Q: An Attorney represents you in Mediation, aren't the contents/files protected from inclusion later in legal Malpractice?

If the defendants in a legal malpractice suit being arbitrated include references (or entire files) as to the negotiations, briefs, or discussions which took place in the underlying personal injury case during mediation, is that considered a Breach of Confidentiality on behalf of the Attorney?

Also, understanding that a Mediator can not be made to testify, are there any circumstances which can open the door to allow a Plaintiff the use of the Mediators take on the valuation of the case if it hadn't been for the actions or non-action of the Attorney?

4 Lawyer Answers
Robert Kane
Robert Kane
Answered
  • Criminal Law Lawyer
  • Eagan, MN
  • Licensed in California

A: Privileged information can be used in defending against malpractice allegations. It certainly wouldn't be fair to allow a client make outrageous allegations that can easily be disproven.

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
Answered
  • Legal Malpractice Lawyer
  • Sacramento, CA
  • Licensed in California

A: In California, mediation confidentiality is governed by Evidence Code sections 1115 to 1128. These provisions generally protect the confidentiality of mediation communications, making them inadmissible in future legal proceedings, including legal malpractice cases.

1. Breach of Confidentiality: If an attorney includes references or files from mediation in a legal malpractice suit, it could potentially be considered a breach of confidentiality. Evidence Code section 1119 prohibits the disclosure of any writings or communications made during mediation, with limited exceptions. Attorneys have a duty to maintain the confidentiality of mediation proceedings.

2. Mediator Testimony: Evidence Code section 1121 states that a mediator is not competent to testify in any subsequent civil proceeding regarding the mediation. There are limited exceptions to this rule, such as when all parties to the mediation expressly agree in writing to waive confidentiality or when the testimony relates to a crime or fraud. However, these exceptions are rare, and it is unlikely that a mediator's valuation of the case would be admissible in a legal malpractice suit.

3. Plaintiff's Use of Mediator's Valuation: In most cases, a plaintiff would not be able to use the mediator's valuation of the case in a legal malpractice suit. The mediator's opinions, impressions, and valuations are generally protected by mediation confidentiality. However, if the attorney's actions or inactions during the mediation were so egregious that they amounted to fraud or a crime, there might be a possibility of using the mediator's testimony. But this would be a rare and exceptional circumstance.

In summary, California law provides strong protections for mediation confidentiality, and it would be difficult to include mediation communications or a mediator's valuation in a legal malpractice case. However, every case is unique, and it is best to consult with an experienced legal malpractice attorney to evaluate the specific facts and circumstances of your situation.

Joel Gary Selik
Joel Gary Selik
Answered
  • Legal Malpractice Lawyer
  • Las Vegas, NV
  • Licensed in California

A: You are correct mediation (not arbitration) matters cannot be used in a legal malpractice case in California. This is a strict rule. Likewise regarding a mediator not testifying.

Isabel de la Riva
Isabel de la Riva
Answered
  • Arbitration & Mediation Lawyer
  • San Antonio, TX

A: Mediations tend to work because of the open communication they allow by the confidentiality rules. Claims and offers made during a mediation cannot be used as evidence if mediation fails. A mediator can only confirm there was a mediation but cannot be made to testify regarding facts/claims in the case.

Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.