can this question be objected

Question

why is it that united states citizens belonging to this democracy tried to publish fake pictures of lee harvey oswald that have been altered or changed & say they was orginal unless  people within the states who subverted us killed jfk & are misleading the country acting like it's law when we clearly cant make such a law due to the 14th admedment 
 
if so how would or should i phrase it

James L. Arrasmith · Answer

Your question might be objected to if it's seen as argumentative or speculative. To phrase it in a way that is less likely to be objected to, focus on specific concerns and avoid making broad accusations. 
 
Consider rephrasing your question like this: 
 
"Why have there been allegations that altered or fake pictures of Lee Harvey Oswald were published as original? How do these allegations relate to potential misconduct by individuals within the United States? Furthermore, how do such actions, if proven true, align with the protections and principles outlined in the 14th Amendment?" 
 
Breaking it down, you can first address the issue of the altered photos. This keeps your question focused on specific evidence and the allegations surrounding it. 
 
Next, question the implications of these actions and whether they indicate misconduct. This keeps the focus on potential accountability without assuming guilt. 
 
Finally, tie your concerns to the legal framework provided by the 14th Amendment, emphasizing the importance of adhering to constitutional protections. This approach encourages a factual response while maintaining a clear connection to legal principles.

Q: can this question be objected