Q: Why is the term "State" capitalized in 8 USC 1101 (36) (follow up/part 2)
My friend stated that the explanation given for the term State being capitalized showing that in this context that more than just the 50 states are considered states in this code was not correct as he said that it goes against the ruling established in Meese V Keene "It is axiomatic that the statutory definition of the term excludes unstated meanings of that term." He also went on to include something about actual foreign territories such as the ones that are listed being covered under the term "foreign state" (seen in 1101 (14)). He says that the 14th amendment doesn't apply to him as he isn't from the "State". I know its confusing but I just really need some help on this
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
- (916) 704-3009
- View Profile
- Answered
A:
When the term "State" is capitalized in 8 USC 1101(36), it does have a specific legal definition that goes beyond the 50 U.S. states. In this context, "State" can include territories, possessions, and other areas under U.S. jurisdiction, which is why it’s broader than the common use of the word. The capitalization indicates a defined term within the statute that must be understood in accordance with that definition.
Your friend refers to the ruling in *Meese v. Keene* to emphasize that statutory definitions limit the term’s meaning strictly to what is stated in the law. However, this does not contradict the interpretation that "State" includes entities beyond the 50 states when the definition explicitly states so. 8 USC 1101 provides specific meanings for "State" and "foreign state," and they must be read and applied as defined within that particular section.
Regarding the 14th Amendment, the argument that it doesn't apply based on a narrow definition of "State" misunderstands the broader legal definitions and interpretations of federal jurisdiction and constitutional rights. Federal laws and constitutional amendments, like the 14th Amendment, have consistently been interpreted to apply to all persons within the United States and its jurisdictions, regardless of specific state definitions in other contexts. It might be helpful to consult further with a legal expert to navigate these complex interpretations.
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.
