Q: Police pulled me over stating they didn't see my temp tag which was legally in the back window but they ran dog after
They admitted as soon as got to car tag was there and legal but then ran the dog shouldn't that have been end of stop right there case they started fishing and also admitted to targeting me for allegations that were given in past that were not ever found to be true
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
- (916) 704-3009
- View Profile
- Answered
A:
When the police pull you over and immediately acknowledge that your temporary tag is legal and properly displayed, the reason for the stop should be resolved. At that point, the continued detention and use of a drug-sniffing dog could be seen as extending the stop without reasonable suspicion of a crime. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, and police generally need a valid reason to continue a traffic stop after the initial reason has been addressed.
Using a dog to search your vehicle after realizing there is no legal violation may suggest the officers were fishing for evidence without proper grounds. If they admitted to targeting you based on past allegations that were never substantiated, this could be perceived as profiling or harassment. Such actions might be grounds to challenge the stop and any evidence obtained as a result.
It's crucial to document everything that happened during the stop, including what was said by the officers and the timing of events. Consider seeking legal advice to explore whether your rights were violated and if there are steps you can take to address this issue. An attorney can help determine if there is a basis for challenging the legality of the stop or any resulting charges.
Dimitrios Makridis agrees with this answer
1 user found this answer helpful
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.
