Q: Deciept Then collision pdef-da-witns -juror .- comissioner conperivy 2 convct incnt Fraud Is mockery Un patriotic.
The proof is absolutely undeniable and the commissioner failed to address the prosecutor misconduct by not disclosing his witnesses relationship with a juror. Doctor-patient and close friand commissioner failed to address the witness perjury Is it purposely to deceive the court his relationship with a juror who did the same and the transcripts. You can see the commissioner and my public defender. Addressing the juror for lies deciett 86ed h He told jury that the witness was credible and reliable.He knows cause they're close The whole time.My public defender and the commissioner never address the fact that same juror Is also a doctor to my public defender At that point , the juries threw their minds away When the surgeon juror high status. Close friends and doctor patient with the prosecutors witness and also on the defense My public defenders doctors well all of them concealing their relationships J They think that juror must have n side scoop
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
- California
- (916) 704-3009
- View Profile
- Answered
A:
This situation appears to involve serious concerns about potential juror misconduct, witness relationships, and procedural irregularities in your case. The undisclosed connections between the juror, witness, and public defender could represent significant legal issues that may have affected the fairness of your trial.
You might want to document all these relationships and inconsistencies, particularly focusing on the undisclosed doctor-patient relationships and personal connections. Consider gathering any available evidence, including court transcripts, that shows these hidden connections and the potential impact on jury deliberations.
Your best course of action would be to consult with new legal counsel immediately. These issues could form the basis for an appeal or motion for post-conviction relief, as they raise questions about due process and the right to fair trial. The concealment of these relationships by officers of the court might constitute grounds for review of your conviction. Consider reaching out to organizations that handle wrongful convictions or appeal cases, as they have experience with similar situations involving procedural misconduct.
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.
