Providence, RI asked in Child Support, Civil Litigation and Family Law for Rhode Island

Q: Home confinement qualifications for non-custodial parent with $50,000 arrears in Rhode Island

I am the custodial parent involved in ongoing legal proceedings regarding child support arrears amounting to $50,000 by the non-custodial parent. The court previously ordered the non-custodial parent to stay current in child support payments, but they only paid for three months due to wage garnishment. The parent has returned to working under the table to avoid garnishment, leading to a body attachment being issued. What qualifications or circumstances would allow this non-custodial parent to be considered for home confinement rather than other consequences?

1 Lawyer Answer
James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
Answered

A: In Rhode Island, home confinement as an alternative to other consequences like jail time for child support arrears is not automatically granted and typically depends on the specific circumstances of the case. A non-custodial parent may be considered for home confinement if they can demonstrate significant personal hardship, such as a serious medical condition or financial instability that would make incarceration unduly burdensome. However, in cases where there is a history of non-compliance and avoiding wage garnishment by working under the table, the court is less likely to grant leniency.

If the non-custodial parent is facing a body attachment for their arrears, it’s likely that the court will first explore other measures, such as further wage garnishment, property liens, or even jail time, to ensure compliance. Home confinement is typically used for non-violent offenders who have shown a commitment to correcting their behavior, so the non-custodial parent would need to show they are willing to pay the arrears and cooperate with child support enforcement.

To explore the possibility of home confinement, your lawyer may need to present evidence of the non-custodial parent’s efforts to improve their situation or their willingness to comply with the court’s orders. If this option is to be considered, they would also need to demonstrate that home confinement is a more viable solution compared to incarceration.

Justia Ask A Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get free answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask A Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between Justia and you, or between any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions and you, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask A Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.