I sell on Ebay and I just got a letter from a law firm saying using "The North Face" is a trademark violation can I just use "North Face" without the "The". They are saying if I don't remove all my listings they may take legal action. My understanding is when I buy a item it becomes my property and... Read more »
It depends what your product is and if it will cause confusion in the marketplace with the trademark registered by The North Face. Each trademark is attached to a good or service. If your good or service is the same or similar to the good or service trademarked by The North Face, then you may have...Read more »
This question is based on a fake model part of an educational module. Due to the limited resources available to obtain such information, I am looking for rough estimates of the costs I should expect. Since the model is not realistic many factors are excluded.
It is possible that by selling products made off-shore that you may be infringing a US patent claim that is from an unexpired US patent. A US patent can be used to prohibit someone from making, using, selling, or offering to sell a product that is covered by one or more patent claims of an...Read more »
This is a simple process if you know what you're doing. It's important that any assignment agreement assigns the rights to not just the trademark, but all goodwill associated with the mark as well, which is language that would be drafted into the applicable assignment agreements. If you would...Read more »
It is technically possible, though very difficult. Last I checked (I once had a hat idea that all my friends told me was dumb), the apparel (and hats) categories of licenses were essentially considered "closed" in that the NFL was not interested in talking to new potential licensees. Those...Read more »
Want a federal trademark for a Colorado based business (local and online sales), but the same name is in use in California by another business (same type of product, just not trademarked). We could ship online orders to California based customers, and are concerned about lawsuits based on Common... Read more »
The other business would likely continue to have common law rights to the mark in California. Generally a senior user of a mark retains the right to use the mark in geographic locations where their business operates, even if a subsequent user registers the mark on the federal registry. Depending...Read more »
I started writing freelance for a company that paid $50/article through paypal. However, I never signed any contract stating copyright laws or even a contract saying they would continue to pay me. It was all through email and phone calls. Because I didn't sign a contract, I'd like to reuse the... Read more »
Your proposed trademark is probably too similar to register in light of Coach on the Go. The services are very similar and only a single letter distinguishes the two trademarks. There are other facts that may be relevant though, such as the validity of the other mark and the date on which you...Read more »
An attorney would have to know more about the existing mark, your proposed and historical use, and the registration of the first mark to answer this question. Assuming the marks are for the same goods or services, the first mark is valid, and the other mark was used first, you probably cannot...Read more »
It looks like your application was suspended because there was another application filed before it for nearly the same mark. Thus, the other application must run its course to see if it results in a registration before your application can be properly evaluated.
This means that a federal trademark registration was cancelled for failure to file the required proof that the mark was still being used in commerce. An Affidavit of Use (under Section 8) must be filed both between the fifth and sixth year after registration, and then again sometime during the...Read more »
My lawyer, Thomas P. Howard, filed my trademark Big Picture Purpose last year. Paid him in full. I emailed him and called. Phone disconnected. Haven't heard back. I found information online regarding my trademark, and I don't know how to move forward. How do I get in touch with trademark people... Read more »
Unless you choose to handle this yourself, you will need a lawyer to handle the prosecution of your trademark application. Application prosecution is the process of responding to objections and rejections by the trademark office. A non-final action means that there is something about the...Read more »
You will need to contact a trademark lawyer directly for specific advice.
For trademarks the issue is brand confusion. A registered mark can apply to a commonly used phase, but the level of protection is comparatively low. There are also issues related to what the mark applies to. That is,...Read more »
My new business has a name but I like to use the acronym along with it. To trademark it, do I have to trademark the acronym and the fulll name as two separate trademarks, or can I file them together under one trademark?
For example, if my business name is T.A.P. and the spelled out version... Read more »
There are multiple factors to consider that are beyond the scope of Justia's Q&A. For a detailed analysis you will need to contact an attorney directly. As a general rule, acronyms can be included in a single trademark application if certain conditions are met. Most trademark holders favor filing...Read more »
Contact an intellectual property lawyer for all the details. If you do not own the trademark and the name (and/or image is registered as active), the use of the mark is possible, but you must be careful (and be aware that you may receive a cease and desist letter). For trademarks the issue is brand...Read more »
Any lawyer familiar with trademarks should be able to file internationally under the Madrid protocol. The protocol covers many developed countries. You can also file in each foreign country (which may provide better protection), but depending on the countries there will likely be additional...Read more »
I am self publishing through Kindle Direct, and do not want to break any copyright laws. I have heard of a company called Damsel in Defense, but wasn't sure if I could still use the terminology for my title.
Copyright and trademarks are two different types of intellectual property protection vehicles. Copyrights cover the text (and any images) of the book, while trademarks cover the title and some brand-related images/designs. Here is the link to the USPTO for a trademark search:...Read more »
A major company with a similar name to mine has a series of trademarks, each have been abandoned OR have a "790 - Cancellation Pending." Google provides no clarity. Does this mean that the trademark IS canceled, but that is being finalized, or does it mean there is a hearing for cancelation that... Read more »
"Cancellation pending" means the PTO (Patent and Trademark Office) is reviewing cancelling the mark(s) because of: (1) abandonment, (2) alleged infringement, (3) genericide or (4) a combination of the listed reasons. The marks are still active until they are cancelled or re-instated. Contact a...Read more »
Please Take Notice: I am not your lawyer unless we enter into an engagement agreement in writing. This is general information that is given for legal education only. It is not legal advice, and it may not work for your specific situation. It is...Read more »
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.