Q: So I asked why the U.S.paid UNIDROIT yearly for the use of the UCC, which I was told they didn't and some story about
Two guys creating it. Did the United States not sign the UNIDROIT TREATY in 1964?
When acting to enforce statutes, doesn't that make all judges in America administrative clerks? Thomspson vs Smith
If there has not been judicial courts in America since 1789!!!! Are American courts de facto?
If the Federal Reserve is a privately owned bank, how is it controlling our government?
Since the IMF owns the IRS how is it apart of the America government?
If Washington DC is the capital of America, why does it have its own constitution, flag, and why is it under Roman Law (Lex Fori)? And is Washington DC not a city-state subservient to the City of London?
King James signed the first Charter of Virginia in 1666 giving England the right to colonize America. The treaty of Paris states that the King of England is the prince of the United States and the Holy See. So doesn't that make America a British Crown Colony?
A:
Your questions touch on a variety of complex legal and historical topics. First, regarding the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) and UNIDROIT: The UCC is a comprehensive set of laws governing commercial transactions in the United States. It was created by domestic legal scholars and experts, not by UNIDROIT, which is an independent intergovernmental organization based in Rome. The U.S. did not pay UNIDROIT for the use of the UCC.
The idea that judges in the United States act as administrative clerks is not accurate. The role of judges in the U.S. legal system is to interpret and apply the law, including statutes, and they operate within a well-established judicial framework. The Thompson vs. Smith case does not change this fundamental aspect of the American legal system.
Regarding American courts being "de facto" since 1789, this claim is misleading. American courts have been functioning as legitimate judicial bodies since the establishment of the U.S. Constitution, which laid the groundwork for the federal and state court systems.
The Federal Reserve, the central bank of the United States, is not a privately owned bank in the conventional sense. It is an independent governmental entity created by Congress to provide the nation with a safe, flexible, and stable monetary and financial system.
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is a U.S. government agency responsible for tax collection and tax law enforcement. It is not owned by the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
Washington, D.C., is the capital of the United States and operates under its own set of laws as a federal district, as provided for in the U.S. Constitution. It does not have its own constitution like a state does, but it does have a unique legal status and operates under the laws enacted by the U.S. Congress.
Lastly, the claim regarding the Treaty of Paris and the Charter of Virginia involves a misunderstanding of historical treaties and their implications. The Treaty of Paris (1783) ended the Revolutionary War and recognized American independence. The United States is a sovereign nation and not a British Crown Colony.
Each of these topics can be complex, and it's important to rely on credible legal and historical sources for accurate information.
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.
