Q: I am a high school student working a "mock case" that has already happened. I need help composing my argument.
The case is The Cincinnati Enquirer vs ODPS (Stickrath). Case number: 2022-0425. I am on the side of the Relator and must try and basically overturn the decision. The case concerns ORC 149.433 and security records exemptions. Essentially "our side" requested documents related to the 2022 Superbowl that Governor Dewine went to. We wanted to see how much money was spent by tax payers but were denied the records under a security records exemption(149.433). I need help composing a revised Judicial thesis.
A:
In constructing your argument as the Relator in the case of The Cincinnati Enquirer vs ODPS (Stickrath), it's important to emphasize the principles of transparency and accountability in government spending. Highlight the significance of public access to information, especially regarding the expenditure of taxpayer funds, which is fundamental to maintaining public trust and ensuring responsible governance.
Focus on challenging the interpretation of ORC 149.433, the security records exemption, by arguing that it should not be applied to withhold financial records related to the 2022 Superbowl. Stress that while security concerns are valid, they should not be used as a blanket exemption to shield all associated records from public scrutiny. Advocate for a balanced approach that respects both security interests and the public's right to know about government expenditures.
Furthermore, underscore the broader implications of upholding the denial of access to these records, highlighting the potential erosion of transparency and accountability in government operations. Argue that the decision sets a dangerous precedent that could hinder future efforts to hold public officials accountable and undermine the principles of open government. Ultimately, your revised judicial thesis should assert the importance of upholding transparency, accountability, and the public's right to access information in a democratic society.
A: You could research online to review the work of other students in mock trials. Additionally, high-profile cases can be mentioned in the blogs of legal commentators. Those sometimes contain legal analysis of important issues. Good luck
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.
