Q: Can one get prosecuted for trafficking when entering any state, in possession of 10gr of pseudoephedrine hydrocloride?
1st time offense. No prescription. Medication bought over a period of time. Individual entering state for holidays.
You can be arrested and prosecuted for anything. However, you can only be convicted if you enter a plea of guilty or no contest, or if the prosecutor can prove every element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt at trial. Ten grams is 10,000 milligrams. A typical pill of pseudoephedrine contains 25mg, so we are talking 400 pills, which is above the presumption limit of 300 pills. Your real question should be not if you CAN BE prosecuted, but rather WILL you actually be prosecuted? Unfortunately, nobody here can answer that question. The answer depends on local law enforcement and perhaps also what ELSE you had in your possession in addition to the pills.
Texas Health and Saftey Code Sec. 481.124 says, in part, that:
An intent to unlawfully manufacture the controlled substance methamphetamine is presumed if the actor possesses or transports 300 tablets or capsules of a product containing ephedrine or pseudoephedrine PLUS:
At least three of the following categories of substances commonly used in the manufacture of methamphetamine:
(i) lithium or sodium metal or red phosphorus, iodine, or iodine crystals;
(ii) lye, sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid, or muriatic acid;
(iii) an organic solvent, including ethyl ether, alcohol, or acetone;
(iv) a petroleum distillate, including naphtha, paint thinner, or charcoal lighter fluid; or
(v) aquarium, rock, or table salt;
At least three of the following items: an item of unregistered lab equipment, or glassware, a plastic or metal container, tubing, a hose, or other item specially designed, assembled, or adapted for use in the manufacture, processing, analyzing, storing, or concealing of methamphetamine.
Anyone who knows anything about the illicit manufacture of meth knows that almost any kitchen container or tool can be "adapted" for this use, so that last category above is basically a catch-all. Also, this list above only creates a legal presumption... the intent can still be proved with other evidence or testimony without the presumption. Conversely, it may be possible to rebut the presumption with evidence or testimony that attempts to explain an alternate reason for the possession of the other "suspicious" items. Hire a good criminal defense attorney and tell her everything, but whatever you do, don't talk to the police.
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.