Tiverton, RI asked in Consumer Law, Insurance Bad Faith and Insurance Defense for California

Q: I have a question about The Carmack Amendment.

I looked at the information in the link you sent. Thank you for responding.

First, I searched for "diminished", then for "only" in order to locate anything that states that property is only the physical article that was damaged and nothing else that is commonly also known as part of a property loss such as Diminished Value.

The purpose of the Carmack Amendment was to relieve shippers of the burden of searching out a

particular negligent carrier from among the often numerous carriers handling an interstate shipment of

goods.” Reider v. Thompson, 339 U.S. 113, 119, 70 S.Ct. 499, 94 L.Ed. 698 (1950).

A car transporters insurer has denied payment for inherent diminished value and loss of use citing The Carmack Amendment. The insurer feels the amendment only applies to the property damage (repairs to a new car being transported) for which they took full liability. Is this a narrow view that would absolve them from compensating a plaintiff for the car's Diminished Value?

1 Lawyer Answer
Leon Bayer
Leon Bayer
Answered
  • Consumer Law Lawyer
  • Long Beach, CA
  • Licensed in California

A: The Carmack Amendment is a 1906 revision to the Interstate Commerce Act of 1877, which regulates the relationship between shipping companies and the owners of goods under shipment. The Carmack Amendment limits the liabilities of these shipping companies, known as carriers, to loss or damage of the property itself. See, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/49/14706 and https://blog.intekfreight-logistics.com/carmack-amendment-explained

1 user found this answer helpful

Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.