Sebastopol, CA asked in Consumer Law and Lemon Law for California

Q: I purchased a pre-owned vehicle with time remaining on the New Vehicle Warranty but denied coverage by a service center.

The New Vehicle Warranty is transferable. I participated in an arbitration and the manufacturer was ordered to repair the car. The manufacturer has blacklisted the car, preventing any service done to the car including recall repairs, can't even make a service appointment. Since I've completed the arbitration, do I have a Mag Moss Act case based on the fact the blacklisting of the car acts as a disclaimer to the warranty, which is what Mag Moss Act is all about. The car technically isn't a lemon. The issue is about the blacklisting, which I think might have been done due to an error in the CPO paperwork. The manufacturer is not cooperating. Mag Moss Act allows damages and legal fees. I want to initiate a case and seek reimbursement for my lost time (200 emails, around 100 calls, I'm self employed, so the time is money) Also, the blacklisting majorly effects the value of the car which I purchased as an investment. The original MSRP on the car was in the range of $200k

Related Topics:
2 Lawyer Answers
Scott Richard Kaufman
Scott Richard Kaufman
Answered
  • Consumer Law Lawyer
  • Los Altos, CA
  • Licensed in California

A: You have quite a few issues here in your post. There are quite a few legal issues as well that relate. The biggest issue right now is there's a recent case in California that says used cars are no longer covered by the lemon law. A good lemon law attorney can probably find a way around that but there are no guarantees it's open season on consumers in California now...

Leon Bayer agrees with this answer

Leon Bayer
Leon Bayer
Answered
  • Consumer Law Lawyer
  • Long Beach, CA
  • Licensed in California

A: The damage to the windshield was caused by the negligence of the repair shop, wasn't it? If so, it is not a mechanical defect and is outside of the warranty and the manufacturer has no responsibility for it. Your claim is against the shop.

Damages for your wasted time is not recoverable.

You might have a claim against the party who sold you the car. That would require you to prove that the car had existing hidden defects, known to the seller. I think the manufacturer has a duty to disclose the warranty repair history.

Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.