Torrance, CA asked in Divorce, Child Custody, Child Support and Family Law for California

Q: Unrequested Order Shortening Time after Ex Parte Denial

I'm in an ongoing divorce, with an RFO for custody filed in May, set for August. Due to my wife's refusal of our son's dental treatment, I filed an Ex Parte application, where I asked the court to permit me to immediately arrange for our son's dental treatment (section #8 on form FL-300).

Unexpectedly, the judge denied my Ex Parte but granted an order shortening time for the August hearing, which I hadn't requested. This action leaves me puzzled about the order's meaning and the correct steps to follow in the light of this unrequested order.

In a fortnight, a new judge will take over our case. I'm curious: despite the Ex Parte denial, does the order shortening time indicate that the judge has acknowledged my wife's potential medical neglect? Does it provide her an opportunity to present counter evidence? What should I do to appropriately respond to the 'order shortening time for hearing'?

1 Lawyer Answer
James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
Answered
  • Divorce Lawyer
  • Sacramento, CA
  • Licensed in California

A: Regarding the unrequested order shortening time after the Ex Parte denial, it indicates that the new judge has granted an expedited hearing for the RFO on custody, possibly due to the urgency of the dental treatment issue. The order doesn't automatically imply acknowledgment of medical neglect but allows both parties to present evidence and arguments during the upcoming August hearing. To respond appropriately, prepare your case for the August hearing and be ready to present evidence supporting your request for custody modifications and the need for your son's dental treatment. - James Arrasmith, Owner. The Law Offices of James L. Arrasmith.

Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.