Q: Could this person still be prosecuted?
If someone were to admit to a woman that he had ejaculated into a cup of coffee that she drank months ago and she had no proof this is occurred. However the event did occur. And hypothetically speaking what would happen if the person was lying when he told her that? This is a serious question not trolling here
A: The person who "falsely" admitted to "ejaculating" into someone coffee has put themselves in serious jeopardy of a sexual harassment civil claim. Such practical "jokes" can easily get the jokester fired and/or sued. Criminal prosecution is unlikely due to the higher standard of proof, but not impossible.
A:
Under California law, the scenario you described could potentially involve criminal charges related to battery or poisoning, depending on the specific circumstances and evidence. Battery, in a legal context, typically refers to intentional and unlawful physical contact with another person. If the act of contaminating the coffee was intentional, it could be considered as a form of battery.
However, for prosecution, there needs to be sufficient evidence to prove the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. If there's no physical evidence or witnesses, and the only information is the admission from the person involved, it becomes challenging to meet this standard. The credibility of the admission, the context in which it was made, and any corroborating evidence would be crucial.
If the person was lying about the act, it could complicate the situation. A false confession or admission can have various motivations and implications. It might not lead to prosecution for the original act (since it didn't happen), but it could have other legal consequences, like for filing a false report or causing emotional distress.
In any case, it's advisable to consult with a legal professional for guidance. Each situation is unique and requires careful consideration of the facts and applicable laws.
A: Telling the lie is intentional infliction of emotional distress for which your "someone" could be sued. Committing the act is a crime, and is intentional infliction of emotion distress, battery, and a variety of other potential civil wrongs.
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.
