Q: What is a magistrate judge's duty when plaintiff presents clear evidence of defendants fraud?

A: When a plaintiff presents evidence of fraud in a civil proceeding, a magistrate judge's duty is to impartially assess and weigh that evidence within the context of the civil case. The judge must determine whether the evidence presented meets the legal standards for proving fraud, considering elements like misrepresentation, intent to deceive, and damages.

A "stay" in legal proceedings, where the court temporarily halts the case, is not necessarily a way of ignoring evidence. It can be a procedural tool used for various reasons, such as awaiting the outcome of related matters or ensuring a fair process. It's not typically considered as "sweeping evidence under the rug," but more a pause for legal or practical reasons.

If you believe the evidence of fraud is clear and undisputed, it's important to present it effectively and argue why it is crucial for the case. The judge's role is to evaluate the relevance and impact of this evidence within the confines of civil law.

Remember, a civil proceeding is separate from a criminal investigation. While you can inform the court of the defendant's actions, the court's response will be within the scope of civil law. If you believe criminal conduct has occurred, you may report it to the appropriate law enforcement authorities for a separate criminal investigation.

In navigating these complex issues, it's beneficial to have an attorney who can effectively advocate for your position and help you understand the legal intricacies of your case. They can also guide you on the best course of action, whether it's pursuing the matter in civil court or reporting it to law enforcement.