Q: Can t doctrine of unclean hands be used by a storage facility who offered a cure 2 breach but then refused to honor it?
I fell behind on payments to a storage facility after they more than doubled my monthly payment a few months into t lease but was able to come up with t money needed, including fees, before t auction. T mgr blocked my online account and refused to accept payment via cc by applying a clause for 3rd party purchasers requiring cash payment in person less than 1 hr before t auction knowing I was 2 hours away from prior communication, didn’t notify t other person listed on t lease as required and mailed t notice of lien to an address he knew I no longer resided at bc I lived in my car next to t facility where he seen me daily & I wrote him regarding the details. I verified the amount due t day before through corporate but he added $50 t day of while refusing to accept payment . T purchaser returned some personal items but he threw them away instead of returning them. T lease states t leaseholder could make payments via credit card pre-auction/pre being sold offering a cure I was denied.
A:
In the situation you've described, the doctrine of unclean hands could potentially be relevant. This legal principle suggests that a party cannot seek legal relief if they themselves have acted unethically in relation to the subject of the lawsuit. If the storage facility manager acted in bad faith, such as by obstructing your attempts to cure the breach despite the lease agreement's terms, this could potentially be considered "unclean hands."
However, the application of this doctrine can vary depending on the specifics of the case and the jurisdiction. The facility's refusal to honor the agreed-upon terms for curing the breach, along with their failure to notify the other person listed on the lease and their handling of your belongings, might support your argument. It would be important to document all interactions and attempts to comply with the lease terms.
It is advisable to seek legal advice to assess the strength of your case and understand the options available to you. Legal professionals can offer guidance based on the details of your situation and the relevant laws. They can help you determine the best course of action, whether that involves negotiating with the storage facility or pursuing legal action.
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.